By Anthony Iwuoma
By James
Kindly share:
A disturbing video clip circulating from the recent governorship election in Ekiti State allegedly shows stacks of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) being distributed to individuals described as “voters.”
At the same time, there were widespread reports and viral accounts of vote buying allegedly taking place in the full glare of the public.
If these reports and videos are authentic, they raise troubling questions that strike at the very foundation of Nigeria’s democracy.
How did such a large number of PVCs end up in the hands of a few individuals? Who were the people receiving them? Were they the legitimate owners of those cards? How did they pass through accreditation and vote? Where were the electoral officials and security agencies? Most importantly, how come these activities allegedly took place openly, and nobody has been arrested?
These are not minor questions. They go directly to the credibility of the electoral process itself.
An election is not simply about announcing a winner. It is about ensuring that the process through which that winner emerges is transparent, credible, and reflective of the genuine will of the people. Once serious allegations of PVC trafficking, voter manipulation, and vote buying emerge and remain unanswered, every declaration of victory becomes clouded by doubt.
Democracy survives not merely on results but on public trust.
What makes the situation even more disturbing is that Nigerians have seen this pattern before. Videos emerge. Citizens raise alarm. Observers document irregularities. Political actors exchange accusations. Electoral authorities issue routine assurances. Security agencies promise investigations. Then silence follows. No arrests. No prosecutions. No meaningful consequences.
The message this sends is dangerous: electoral crimes can be committed without fear of punishment.
The reports of vote buying are particularly alarming. The ballot is supposed to be the expression of a citizen’s conscience, not a commodity to be purchased by the highest bidder. Yet election after election, allegations of cash-for-votes schemes continue to surface with little evidence that those responsible are being brought to justice.
When vote buying allegedly occurs in public and no one is arrested, citizens are left to wonder whether the institutions responsible for protecting democracy are unwilling or unable to perform their duties. The role of security agencies is not to observe electoral violations; it is to prevent them and apprehend those who commit them. Their silence and apparent inaction only deepen public suspicion.
The consequence is a growing culture of impunity.
Every uninvestigated allegation, every ignored video, every unpunished offender chips away at the legitimacy of the democratic process. Citizens begin to question whether their votes truly matter. They begin to wonder whether elections are won through performance, vision, and public support or through manipulation, financial inducement, and organised electoral malpractice.
This is how faith in democracy begins to erode.
A nation cannot repeatedly ask its people to trust a process that appears incapable of protecting itself. Confidence in elections is not built by declarations from electoral bodies or victory speeches from politicians. It is built through transparency, accountability, and the visible enforcement of the law.
If the allegations emerging from Ekiti are false, then authorities owe Nigerians a transparent investigation and a clear explanation. If the allegations are true, then every individual involved, regardless of status, influence, or political affiliation, should face prosecution.
Anything less would amount to institutional endorsement of electoral misconduct.
The opposition also faces a difficult challenge. Many argue that security agencies often fail to act decisively and that election petitions can drag on for years without delivering meaningful justice. Yet surrendering the democratic space is not an option.
Opposition parties must strengthen election monitoring mechanisms, train and deploy effective polling-unit agents, invest in technology-driven evidence gathering, collaborate with civil society organisations, document violations meticulously, and pursue electoral accountability relentlessly. They must also unite around a common demand for comprehensive electoral reforms and the prosecution of electoral offenders.
Beyond political parties, civil society groups, religious leaders, traditional institutions, professional bodies, and ordinary citizens must refuse to normalise electoral malpractice. Democracy cannot survive if citizens become spectators while their votes are traded and their rights undermined.
The question Nigerians should be asking is not merely who won the Ekiti governorship election.
The more important question is whether the process inspires confidence.
A victory secured under a cloud of unresolved allegations may produce a governor, but it does little to strengthen democracy. The real victory in any election is not the announcement of a winner. The real victory is the collective confidence of the people that the outcome genuinely reflects their will.
Today, many Nigerians are asking a simple question: how long will this continue?
How long will videos of alleged electoral malpractice emerge without consequences? How long will vote buying occur in public without arrests? How long will PVC-related controversies continue to surface without accountability? How long will institutions charged with protecting democracy appear powerless in the face of obvious violations?
These questions matter because no democracy can survive indefinitely on the goodwill and patience of its citizens. When people repeatedly lose faith in the ballot box, frustration accumulates. When justice is delayed or denied, resentment grows. When institutions fail to enforce the law, dangerous alternatives begin to gain appeal.
That is the path every democracy must avoid.
Nigeria stands at a critical crossroads. Electoral crimes must attract real consequences. Those who undermine elections must be identified, investigated, prosecuted, and punished. The law must be seen to work.
Otherwise, the nation risks drifting toward a future where citizens no longer trust elections, no longer trust institutions, and no longer believe that democratic participation can produce meaningful change.
When that happens, democracy may still exist on paper, but its soul would already be in grave danger.
Anthony Iwuoma is political analyst. He wrote from Owerri
